Cyber Security Vulnerability and DNS

HomeEthical Hacking

Cyber Security Vulnerability and DNS

What is Google? (Tutorial)
What is an Email? (Learn about Email)
Whatsapp Secrets Code List
Cyber Security Vulnerability and DNS

In cyber security, vulnerability is a vulnerability used by cyber attackers to gain unauthorized access to a computer system or to perform unauthorized tasks. Malicious attackers may be allowed to execute code, access system memory, install malware, and steal, destroy, or modify sensitive data.

DNS- Domain Name System

It is safe to mention that while not the Domain name System (DNS), the net wouldn’t be the force it’s today.

In the first days of the Internet, users attempting to succeed in another host on the network were needed to input long information processing variety strings (e.g., a listed IP address for Google). because the internet grew number strings became additional cumbersome and infeasible as most users couldn’t systematically keep in mind the correct sequencing of random numbers.

To modify this process, an answer was developed that supported a data resolution (flat file) that connected every information processing address to a relatively straightforward-to-remember common language address that was easy to recollect and provided easy use.

By the late 1980s, the file had evolved to the name System (DNS) in use today-a system that’s open, distributed, and expands as users, enterprises, net Service suppliers (ISPs) and domains seem on the network. easy use and expandability was the goal but, since cyber security attacks and malware were nearly unknown, DNS security wasn’t a priority.

DNS is extremely effective and works within the background of search activity. net users are assured that when they type in a URL or e-mail address, they will be connected to the correct Web site or e-mail box. Many commercial companies developed brand strategies based on this functionality in order to use the Internet’s reach to develop more customers and increase sales/revenue. Most of these companies adopted a .com extension. The Federal government adopted a .gov extension.

Domain names cyber security

DNS Brand Implications

The functionality of DNS opened the branding world to the Internet. Common names became commonplace brands (e.g. Google, Bing, Amazon, and E-Bay) and powerful strategies were developed to market brands on the Internet.
An entirely new marketing strategy called Search Engine selling (SEM) developed whereby keyword searches associated positioning on search pages developed into a serious industry. Premier inserting on the primary page of a research engine gave the recipient a plus for additional business versus the competition.

Google became a multi-billion dollar concern by developing algorithms that enabled effective and powerful keyword searches. Web-based purchases supported by easy, convenient keyword searches currently account for 20-30% of all retail business and therefore the web-based e-commerce market share continues to fancy robust growth. DNS is an integral part of this success. however as traffic on the net grew, the complete net became vulnerable to Cyber attacks. a decent portion of this vulnerability is attributed to the inherent vulnerability of DNS.

DNS is inherently Insecure

The original style of the name System (DNS) didn’t embody sturdy security features; instead, it absolutely was designed to be an ascendable distributed system and makes an attempt to feature security, whereas maintaining backward compatibility was rudimentary and did not keep step with the abilities of malicious hackers. As a result cyber attacks created net chaos.

Security could prime the list of enterprise and network administrators, however too often the link between security vulnerability and DNS isn’t understood. so as to enhance security and defend against cyber attacks, government agencies, industrial enterprises, and network directors should acknowledge the importance of DNS to the secure operation of the net.

Consequently, any commercial company that uses the net for sales, e-commerce, service, marketing, or logistics, likewise as net Service suppliers (ISPs) and large, strategically sensitive government networks got to bear in mind of DNS vulnerability.

As the net expands in terms of users, devices, and traffic, so will the chance for classy DNS mayhem-whether malicious (hacking), intensifying (spam), or black (accessing sites containing content that violates legal and regulative mandates) or devastating denial of service (DoS) attacks.

It became terribly evident that enterprises associated ISPs should shield their users and networks-sometimes from the amateur hacker however progressively from the social group and state-sponsored cyber-terrorism. one amongst of} the foremost vulnerable, vital areas was DNS. Cyber attacks are expected to extend and have a much bigger impact because the net grows.

The internet is additionally growing by an order of magnitude and around every user of the net is directly stricken by the name System (DNS). The name System (DNS) is an important part of the net. several Internet security mechanisms, together with host access management and defenses against spam and phishing, heavily rely upon the integrity of the DNS infrastructure and DNS Servers.

DNS Servers

DNS servers running the software package called BIND (for Berkeley net Name Daemon, or typically Berkeley net Name Domain), is one in every of the foremost normally used name System (DNS) server on the Internet, and still proclaims it to be so.

Presently, BIND is that the actual normal DNS server. it’s a freeware and is distributed with most UNIX and UNIX platforms. Historically, BIND underwent 3 major revisions, every with considerably totally different architectures: BIND4, BIND8, and BIND9. BIND4 and BIND8 are currently considered technically obsolete. BIND9 may be a ground-up rewrite of BIND that includes complete name System Security Extensions (DNSSEC) support additionally to alternative features and enhancements. however, even with the rewrite BIND, all told versions remain vulnerable.
A new version, BIND ten is below development but the effectiveness of it its security measures are untested. It’s 1st unleash was in the Gregorian calendar month 2010 and is predicted to be a five-year project to complete its feature set.

Although BIND continues to be the actual DNS software package as a result of it’s enclosed by most UNIX-based mostly server makers at no cost, a variety of other developers have made the DNS Server software package that addresses the inherent weaknesses of BIND. Ratings of those packages are found on Common Vulnerabilities:

Cache Poisoning and Distributed Denial of Service

Cache Poisoning and Distributed Denial of Service

The DNS vulnerabilities open the affected networks to varied sorts of cyber attacks however cache poisoning and DDoS attacks are sometimes the foremost commons.

Cache poisoning is arguably the most distinguished and dangerous attack on DNS. DNS cache poisoning leads to a DNS resolver storing (i.e., caching) invalid or malicious mappings between symbolic names and information processing addresses. as a result of the method of breakdown a reputation depends on authoritative servers placed elsewhere on the Internet, the DNS protocol is as such susceptible to cache poisoning. Cache poisoning permits the culprit to realize access to proprietary info like bank records and Social Security numbers.

A denial-of-service attack (DoS attack) or distributed denial-of-service attack (DDoS attack) is targeted on creating pc resources out of stock to its supposed users. A DDoS consists of the combined efforts to forestall internet} web site or service from functioning expeditiously or at all.

Perpetrators of DoS attacks generally target sites or services hosted on high-profile web servers reminiscent of government agencies, banks, MasterCard payment gateways, and even root nameservers. The term is usually used with regards to computer networks. Of particular concern are DoS or DDoS attacks on large government networks like the Department of Defense or Veteran’s administration networks.

One way of compromising the network for a DDoS attack is through the vulnerabilities of CNS.

Until effective solutions are developed that reduce DNS vulnerabilities cyber attacks will increase particularly as new protocols expand the reach of the Internet.

Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6)

It was inevitable that the Internet capacity would be exhausted and it is near that point now.

The Internet is rapidly running out of capacity and solutions in the form of expanded Internet Protocols for this problem may produce extra vulnerability. A development called IPv4 address exhaustion results and net house disappears.

A new net Protocol, Version six (IPv6), maybe a replacement for net Protocol version four (IPv4) because of the primary net Protocol operational since 1981. The propulsion for the plan of the net Protocol was the predictable IPv4 address exhaustion. In effect, while not new protocols, the net can run out of capacity.

IPv6 includes a considerably larger address space than IPv4. IPv6 uses a 128-bit address whereas this IPv4 uses thirty-two bits. This growth provides flexibility in allocating addresses and routing traffic and eliminates the growing would like for network address translation (NAT), that gained widespread preparation as an attempt to alleviate IPv4 address exhaustion.

IPv6 protocol expansion, however, additionally opens new vulnerabilities for malicious cyber attacks as additional and more users and applications gain access to the Internet.


Some analysts believe that the name System Security Extensions (DNSSEC) provides a good and comprehensive resolution for DNS vulnerability issues. this is often not the case, however.

DNSSEC permits the employment of digital signatures that may be wont to certify DNS information that’s coming back to question responses. This helps combat attacks reminiscent of pharming, cache poisoning, DDoS, and DNS redirection that is wont to commit fraud, identity theft, and therefore the distribution of malware however doesn’t guarantee secure information within the system.

It is widely believed that securing the DNS is critically vital for securing the net as a whole, but the preparation of DNSSEC specifically has been hampered by many procedural difficulties not the smallest amount of that is that the lack of universal deployment associated overcoming the perceived complexness of deployment.

Some of those issues are in the method of being resolved, and deployment in varied domains is in progress. this could take an extended amount of your time but and through the process, DNS continues to be vulnerable.

Even with the technical limitations, progress in implementing DNSSEC has been slow particularly in the Federal Government. Although the Federal Office of Management and Budget mandated that all government agencies will adopt DNSSEC by December 2009, nine months after the deadline for federal agencies to implement DNSSEC, only 30-40% of agencies have complied.

Government Network Solutions

Today’s complex government networks must deliver the utmost security and reliability to protect against potential national security threats. A poorly architected DNS service infrastructure poses one of the greatest security vulnerabilities for any government network.

Likewise, choosing the wrong DNS solution can flip an otherwise well-architected service infrastructure into a compromised system capable of undermining information integrity and network stability.

Security against cyber attacks is necessary for state networks. quite the other networks, government networks demand the best level of observation and visibility, security fortification, alerting, and obstruction to confirm acceptable corrective action. while not this protection, National Security and other nationwide infrastructure is

Government Networks Have distinctive desires however Face Cumbersome Solutions

Until recently, federal cyber security efforts are fragmented and cumbersome. bigger attention was paid to long coverage necessities so as to satisfy standards. though standards are vital for establishing a baseline of security and meeting standards in order to reduce cyber attack damage, overly restrictive reporting requirements diminish their effectiveness.

In many ways, for government organizations, the information superhighway has become a virtual minefield. Government networks face this new global problem as much, if not more than other networks.

Not only do they have to support their users’ performing the tasks necessary to complete their missions with uninterrupted Internet access, but they also have to ensure that this access remains uncompromised. Network administrators must continuously balance the need for open access for critical users against the need to keep the network secure.

When a user at a government organization goes to a web site (on multiple sorts of networks), they have to grasp that the content they receive is precisely what they were expecting. And rather like subscribers on a Service supplier network, they got to be shielded from renowned and suspected sites won’t force the lock computers. The vital of terribly giant networks and the drive to interconnect agencies create several federal networks significantly vulnerable.

All of this must be through with the best doable level of performance and availability. Government organizations also need to be completely bound that they will comply with DNSSEC and IPv6 mandates.

The government recognizes is addressing the needs of cyber security. Recent steps include the creation of Cyber Command for DOD and Intelligence Agencies, a streamlining by the Office of Management and Budget of reporting requirements, and an elevation of cyber security to a priority effort by the administration.

However, progress has been slow. Officials from key federal agencies, including the departments of Defense, Homeland Security, and the Office of Management and Budget say they’re moving too slowly to implement most of the 24 recommendations President Barack Obama outlined in his May 2009 cyber policy review.


error: Content is protected !!